Jack Smith regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ claims
The Supreme Court has signaled its intention to expedite the review of a petition by special counsel Jack Smith concerning the potential prosecution of former President Donald Trump for his alleged involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election results.
Smith urgently requested the Court’s prompt action to avoid any delays that might postpone the trial until after next year’s presidential election.
THIS JUST IN:
— MeidasTouch (@MeidasTouch) December 11, 2023
The Supreme Court is ACTING FAST!
SCOTUS just GRANTED the Special Counsel’s motion for expedited review of the petition from Jack Smith regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ claims.
In response, the Court has directed Trump’s
Jack Smith Regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ Claims that emphasizes legal team to respond to the special counsel’s motion by December 20, two days later than Smith’s initial request. The Court’s upcoming scheduled conference day for such matters is Jan. 5, 2024. However, the Court’s brief order did not indicate its final decision.
The campaign representing Trump expressed its stance, stating, “There is no reason to rush this sham to trial except to injure President Trump and tens of millions of his supporters. President Trump will continue to fight for Justice and oppose these authoritarian tactics.” Jack Smith regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ claims & so on.
The Court’s private meeting on Jan. 5, 2024,
This is scheduled next, with uncertainty regarding an earlier convening to address Smith’s request.
Perhaps bad luck comes in threes for Donald Trump:
— Tim Hogan 浩勤 (@TimInHonolulu) December 12, 2023
1/ SCOTUS immediately granted Jack Smith’s motion to expedite and gave Donald Trump just 9 days to file a response to the most significant cert petition in recent history. pic.twitter.com/Z1Uv6CPS72
Jack Smith regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ claims& the central point of contention revolves around a Dec. 1 ruling from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, which dismissed arguments by Trump’s lawyers claiming immunity from federal prosecution. Chutkan’s order emphasized that the office of the president “does not confer a lifelong ‘get-out-of-jail-free’ pass.”
Trump’s legal team contends that he cannot be charged for actions within his official duties as president, a stance vigorously opposed by prosecutors.
Smith’s team emphasized the urgency of the matter, stating
“The United States recognizes that this is an extraordinary request. This is an extraordinary case. The Supreme Court should grant certiorari and set a briefing schedule that would permit this case to be argued and resolved as promptly as possible.”
Jack Smith Regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ Claims also mentions whether Should the justices opt not to intervene at this stage, Jack Smith regarding Trump’s ‘immunity’ claims also Trump’s appeal would proceed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Smith has sought expedited review there as well, acknowledging that even a swift appellate decision might not reach the Supreme Court in time for review and final judgment before the court’s traditional summer break.
For more updates and information on this evolving legal matter, stay tuned to reliable sources and legal commentary.